Retirement resilience - why protection is the foundation

Catherine Trimble Head of intermediary distribution for protection

Catherine Trimble

Head of intermediary distribution for protection

The retirement plan that breaks first is built on assumptions  

If a retirement plan assumes uninterrupted income, it is not a plan. It’s a hope.  

When income is treated as a client’s most valuable asset, protection becomes the foundation that keeps every other part of the plan standing.  

Retirement planning is often approached like a maths problem: get the contribution rate right, choose the fund, keep an eye on fees, review regularly. All sensible. All necessary.  

But many plans still rest on one quiet assumption: that a client will be able to keep earning in a predictable way for decades. Scottish Widows’ latest Retirement Report shows how fragile that can be. In the last five years, a third of working‑age adults have had their work or earnings affected by physical or mental health issues. Almost a quarter think they may not be able to afford to retire because poor health will affect their ability to work.1  

That matters because income is not just a cashflow line. It is the engine behind everything else. Without it, there is nothing to contribute to a pension, less ability to absorb higher costs, and less headroom to recover after disruption. It also becomes harder to make long‑term decisions when life is already demanding enough.  

This is where protection becomes more than a product category. It becomes part of responsible retirement planning because it helps keep the plan standing when life changes.  

The real vulnerability is rarely visible in the spreadsheet. 

Headline averages can mask the gaps that matter most in real lives. One of the starkest is health. Among people whose physical or mental health affects day‑to‑day life, half are projected to face pension poverty, around double the rate for those in better health.1

It is tempting to treat this as a pensions problem. Often, it is an income resilience problem. When health disrupts earnings, people shift from planning to coping. Contributions pause. Savings are used to cover bills. Retirement choices narrow. This is not about willpower. It is what happens when the present becomes urgent.  

The prevalence outlook adds another layer. Serious illness is not a rare edge case. Cancer prevalence is projected to rise by 58% from 2025 to 2045, from 3.4 million to 5.4 million people living with and beyond cancer.2 That does not mean most clients will face severe disruption, but it does mean more clients will have health as a real planning variable at some point in their working lives.  

The adviser opportunity is to bring this into the retirement conversation early, in a way that feels practical and supportive. Not ‘we need to talk about protection.’ More: ‘Let’s make sure your plan can still work if your income changes.’

A simple shift advisers can lead

Positioning protection as the foundation of retirement resilience does not mean turning every review into a product conversation. It means making the plan more resilient to real‑life disruption.  

A practical way to do this is to treat income resilience as a core planning layer:  

  • The retirement layer: contributions, pots, outcomes.  
  • The disruption layer: what happens if income drops or stops?  
  • The resilience layer: what keeps the plan standing through that disruption.  

The resilience layer will look different for different clients. For some, it is savings buffers. For others, it is employer support and sick pay. For many, it is a combination of protection and support that creates breathing space at the point where life changes.  

The value of this approach is that it meets clients where they are. It is not fear‑based. It is practical. And it helps make retirement planning feel trustworthy because it acknowledges the reality of working life, not the idealised version.  

Series next: why the real risk is not stopping contributions. It is not getting back to where you were.

 

In practice

The one‑line point

A retirement plan is only as strong as the income behind it.  

The evidence

A third of working‑age adults have had their work or earnings affected by health in the last five years. Almost a quarter worry poor health will stop them affording retirement. Those whose health effects day‑to‑day life are far more likely to face pension poverty.  

Three questions to add to your review

If you could not work for six months, what would change first: lifestyle, saving, or retirement age?

How long could your household run on savings alone if your income stopped?

If your income dropped, what would you want to protect first: the bills, your pension contribution, or both?

The client‑safe line

Retirement planning is not only about saving for the future. It is also about protecting your ability to keep saving if life disrupts your income.

The next step

At the next review, agree an ‘income resilience number’: the minimum monthly income the client would want protected to keep key commitments and longer‑term plans intact.

Sources:

1 Scottish Widows Retirement Report, 2026 

2 Scottish Widows & Macmillan, Living with and beyond Cancer in 2045 Report, 2026